Federal CFPA Case Peters v. Checkout.com, No. 2026-CFP-00004: Discovery Ongoing, Response Deadline August 27, 2026
Administrative Law Judge confirms discovery ongoing in Case No. 2026-CFP-00004 while granting Checkout.com extension to
Press Release Disclaimer: This is a press release distributed through the XPR Media network. It has not been independently verified by our newsroom.

![]()
Administrative Law Judge confirms discovery ongoing in Case No. 2026-CFP-00004 while granting Checkout.com extension to file response
COVINGTON, LA, UNITED STATES, August 16, 2026 /EINPresswire.com/ — A federal whistleblower retaliation proceeding against global payments company Checkout.com is advancing before the U.S. Department of Labor’s Office of Administrative Law Judges (OALJ), with discovery confirmed as ongoing and Checkout.com’s Complaint Response now due on or before August 27, 2026.
The case, Peters v. Checkout.com, Case No. 2026-CFP-00004, was filed by James Peters on January 28, 2026, when he submitted a whistleblower complaint with the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) alleging violations of the employee-protection provisions of the Consumer Financial Protection Act (CFPA), 12 U.S.C. § 5567. OSHA dismissed the complaint on February 25, 2026. Peters appealed the dismissal, and the OALJ docketed the case on March 24, 2026. The matter was assigned to Administrative Law Judge Heather C. Leslie on July 7, 2026.
Judge Leslie issued a Preliminary Order on July 16, 2026, establishing deadlines for both parties. Peters filed his Pleading Complaint on July 30, 2026. Checkout.com subsequently moved for a 14-day extension of time to file its Complaint Response, requesting a new deadline of August 27, 2026.
In an order issued August 10, 2026, Judge Leslie granted the extension, finding that allowing Checkout.com additional time to prepare both its Complaint Response and briefing on an anticipated standing challenge under 12 U.S.C. § 5567 constituted good cause. Peters had opposed the extension, arguing in part that additional time could affect the discovery schedule. Judge Leslie expressly rejected that concern, writing:
“Discovery will continue and is ongoing.”
Peters will be given an opportunity to oppose Checkout.com’s anticipated standing challenge once filed. The August 10 order does not resolve the standing challenge or the merits of Peters’s CFPA claim.
Peters is representing himself in the proceeding without legal counsel. The case is being heard in Indianapolis, Indiana, and the CFPA provides that if the Department of Labor does not issue a final decision within 210 days of the original complaint, Peters retains the right to bring the matter before a federal district court.
Whistleblower protection cases under the CFPA are relatively uncommon compared to other federal whistleblower statutes, making this proceeding a notable reference point for employees and legal professionals in the financial technology and payments sector.
Case Details:
Case: Peters v. Checkout.com
Case No.: 2026-CFP-00004
Forum: U.S. Department of Labor, Office of Administrative Law Judges
Presiding Judge: Administrative Law Judge Heather C. Leslie
Complaint Response Deadline: August 27, 2026
Status: Discovery ongoing
Official case status is publicly available through the DOL OALJ Case Status Lookup at https://www.oalj.dol.gov/OALJ_Case_Status.html — search: 2026CFP00004.
A full timeline and background on the case is available at: https://techbullion.com/james-peters-v-checkout-com-full-case-timeline-of-the-cfpa-whistleblower-complaint-case-no-2026-cfp-00004/
About Concerned Citizens of Alexandria
Concerned Citizens of Alexandria is a U.S.-based civic organization dedicated to public transparency, legal accountability, and civic advocacy on matters of public interest.
Website: https://concernedcitizensofalexandria.org
Concerned Citizens of Alexandria
James Peters
media@concernedcitizensofalexandria.org
Legal Disclaimer:
EIN Presswire provides this news content “as is” without warranty of any kind. We do not accept any responsibility or liability
for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information contained in this
article. If you have any complaints or copyright issues related to this article, kindly contact the author above.
![]()
Media gallery