Tampa St. Petersburg, FL, August 4, 2026 —

TALLAHASSEE, FL – A Florida judge has determined that the wording of a proposed property tax amendment, which had the backing of Gov. Ron DeSantis, is misleading and does not meet legal standards for clarity and neutrality. The ruling stated that the language used was “more akin to a political slogan” than the legally required impartial description for voters.

Despite the judge’s findings on the language, the amendment is still slated to appear on the November ballot. However, the order mandates that the state Attorney General’s office must revise portions of the proposed amendment. The goal of this rewrite is to ensure that voters are presented with a fair and accurate statement that will assist them in making an informed decision.

The proposed amendment seeks to increase the homestead exemption for property owners in Florida. The specifics of the original language deemed misleading by the court were not detailed, but the judge’s directive implies a need for more objective and less persuasive phrasing. The requirement for neutral language in ballot initiatives is intended to prevent proponents or opponents from unfairly influencing voter perception through the summary provided on the ballot itself.

The Attorney General’s office will now undertake the task of redrafting the ballot summary and title to comply with the judge’s order. This process typically involves presenting the proposed changes to the court for approval before they can be finalized for the upcoming election. The outcome of this revision could significantly impact how voters understand the amendment’s implications when they cast their ballots.



Story summarized from the original created by By Romy Ellenbogen, Times staff on www.tampabay.com, see more information here.

About The Author